♥️ Snapdragon 835 Vs Exynos 9810

Exynos 9810 VS Snapdragon 845. Il ne faut toutefois pas oublier que l'an dernier, l'Exynos 8895 était aussi plus performant que le Snapdragon 835. Que la situation se répète ne serait 1,000点以内の差となり、僅かの差でExynos 9810が優位に立ちました。Snapdragon 845よりもビッグコアとリトルコア双方とも0.1GHz高いのでこの差が生まれたのでしょう。ちなみにSnapdragon 835のCPU性能は約73,000点なのでかなり進化していることになります。 GPU性能 So găng 4 chipset đầu bảng: Snapdragon 845, Exynos 9810, Kirin 970 và Apple A11 Nguyễn Anh Tuấn 13/12/17 38 bình luận Tại hội nghị công nghệ ở Hawaii, Qualcomm cho ra mắt chipset thế hệ mới nhất Snapdragon 845. Họ tuyên bố rằng, Snapdragon 845 có hiệu suất lên đến hơn 30% so với Snapdragon 835 và còn hỗ trợ mạnh mẽ cho công nghệ VR. How our grading system works? Our grading list includes A+, A, B, C, and D grades. A+ grade: The A+ grade is entitled to the best GPUs like A15 bionic GPU, Adreno 660, etc. Los núcleos Samsung M3 se basan en el diseño propio de Samsung y ahora ofrecen una tubería más amplia, memoria caché mejorada y caches más grandes. Esto lleva a un rendimiento single core dos veces más rápido y un rendimiento multi-core 40 por ciento mejorado, según Samsung (muy probablemente comparado con el anterior Exynos 8898). The Exynos 8895 is quite identical to the Snapdragon 835 chipset from Qualcomm, which was unveiled last year. Both these chipsets are built using Samsung's 10nm LPE FinFET process, and feature 64-bit octa-core CPUs, support for 4K screens, dual-ISPs, Gigabit LTE modems, Bluetooth 5.0, and faster wired and wireless charging solutions. Both the Snapdragon 845 vs Exynos 9810 GPU savaşı Adreno 630 vs Mali-G72 Qualcomm, yeni işlemcisinde yeni bir GPU kullanıyor. Adreno 630 GPU birimi Snapdragon 835 işlemcisinde yer alan Adreno 540 modeline göre %30 daha hızlı ve %30 daha tasarruflu bir yapıya sahip olacak. Görüntü çıkış desteği ise 2.5 kat daha fazla olacak. While the Exynos 9810 is competitive against the Snapdragon 835 in graphics workloads and beats it in the case of GFXBench and Basemark, the SoC does throttle heavily in the Galaxy S9+'s chassis. . Samsung Exynos 9810 ► remove from comparisonThe Samsung Exynos 9 9810 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2018 and should be integrated in the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 series at least partly. It integrates eight CPU cores octa core in two clusters. The performance cluster integrates four Samsung M3 at GHz and the power efficiency cluster four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at GHz. The Samsung M3 cores are based on Samsungs own design and now offer a wider pipeline, improved cache memory and bigger caches. This leads to a twice as fast single-core performance and a 40 percent improved multi-core performance according to Samsung most likely compared to the previous Exynos 8898. The integrated LTE modem also got a siginifcant upgrade and now supports LTE for up to Gbps download and 200 Mbps upload. This is achieved with 6x20 MHz CA, 256-QAM in download and 2x20 MHz in upload. As a GPU, Samsung integrates a ARM Mali G72MP18 only 18 clusters, compared to the 20 clusters of the predecessor G71MP20. Most likely Samsung increases performance due to a higher core clock of the graphics card. The memory controller looks similar to the 8898 and supports LPDDR4x 1800 MHz. The video engine now also supports 10 bit videos as before 4k120 and VP9 de- and encoding. The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 10nm LPP process the Exynos 8898 still used the 10nm LPE process that should also help with some of the performance Snapdragon 835 8998 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Mobile Platform MSM8998 is a high-end SoC for smartphones mostly Android based that was released early 2017. Its one of the first processors that is manufactured in 10 nm LPE FinFET at Samsung. The SD835 is the successor to the Snapdragon 821. It integrates 4x Kryo 280 at GHz max for performance and 4x Kryo 280 at GHz max for efficiency. Furthermore offers an X16 LTE modem, WiFi, a dual-channel 32-Bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller, an UFS controller, Hexagon 682 DSP, Spectra 180 Image Seonsor Prozessor, Bluetooth GPS, GLONASS, Baeidou, Galileo Satellite Exynos 9820 ► remove from comparisonThe Samsung Exynos 9 9820 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced late 2018 and was first integrated in the Samsung Galaxy S10 smartphones early 2019. The SoC integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to GHz. Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ. The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro 8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload. The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores. The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. The single core performance is, thanks to the big custom cores, a strong suit of the CPU and reaches the levels of Apples mobile SoCs. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks. The predecessor Exynos 9810 can be bested by around 17% in our first benchmarks with the Galaxy S10 Plus. The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 8nm LPP process that should also help with some of the performance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 9820 Cinebench - Cinebench CPU Multi 64 BitCinebench - Cinebench CPU Single 64 BitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single 32bitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi 32bit3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physicsmin 1493 avg 1501 median 4% max 1508 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 18756 avg 23944 median 26226 22% max 26851 Points min 6729 avg 19196 median 20406 17% max 23046 Points min 31297 avg 32016 median 27% max 32308 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2546 avg 2717 median 33% max 3120 Points min 1520 avg 2849 median 2969 37% max 3161 Points min 2925 avg 3123 median 38% max 3480 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2561 avg 2752 median 38% max 3148 Points min 1631 avg 2766 median 2960 42% max 3189 Points min 3077 avg 3226 median 3087 44% max 3513 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3688 avg 3721 median 3698 38% max 3776 Points min 1809 avg 1917 median 1920 20% max 1973 Points min 4499 avg 4510 median 47% max 4529 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 8786 avg 8874 median 8874 10% max 8963 Points min 6006 avg 6515 median 6517 7% max 6799 Points min 10162 avg 10366 median 10374 12% max 10553 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 814 avg 1733 median 2021 29% max 2075 Points min 4881 avg 4958 median 71% max 5034 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2952 avg 5482 median 15% max 6552 Points min 10000 avg 10109 median 10109 25% max 10218 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5895 avg 5915 median 5915 9% max 5935 Points min 5674 avg 6126 median 6126 10% max 6578 Points min 7690 avg 7824 median 12% max 7957 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1961 avg 1965 median 1965 29% max 1969 Points min 1933 avg 1954 median 1954 29% max 1975 Points min 2382 avg 2388 median 36% max 2393 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Coremin 3960 avg 4100 median 4100 7% max 4240 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Coremin 1144 avg 1155 median 1155 23% max 1166 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 895 avg 1039 median 1039 8% max 1183 Points min 1810 avg 2308 median 2308 19% max 2806 Points min 1870 avg 1985 median 16% max 2099 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 1898 avg 2002 median 18% max 2105 Points min 2528 avg 3500 median 32% max 4471 Points min 2997 avg 3050 median 28% max 3102 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 10213 avg 10328 median 10328 20% max 10443 Points min 11609 avg 12054 median 24% max 12498 Points min 14240 avg 14552 median 14552 29% max 14864 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5651 avg 5656 median 5656 11% max 5661 Points min 5777 avg 5936 median 12% max 6094 Points min 7271 avg 7404 median 15% max 7536 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 6025 avg 6099 median 16% max 6172 Points min 7193 avg 7226 median 7226 19% max 7259 Points min 8338 avg 8493 median 22% max 8647 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score min 2060 avg 2509 median 2394 3% max 3189 ms min 2425 avg 3219 median 3175 4% max 4813 ms min 1823 avg 1961 median 2% max 2240 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score min 210 avg median 3% max 387 ms Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 12933 avg 14397 median 14% max 15233 Points min 3086 avg 11209 median 11484 11% max 14300 Points min 18697 avg 20121 median 19% max 20849 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 63 avg median 68 16% max 72 Points AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total ScoreAnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 214090 avg 218110 median 217950 74% max 222290 Points min 150208 avg 173235 median 175032 60% max 185487 Points min 269219 avg 275038 median 273831 93% max 283270 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 7800 avg 8235 median 8294 25% max 8612 Points min 8164 avg 9635 median 27% max 16148 Points min 12202 avg 12486 median 38% max 13096 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 53528 avg 55588 median 55698 68% max 57538 Points min 42180 avg 44325 median 53% max 47943 Points min 67209 avg 68326 median 68203 84% max 69689 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 91292 avg 92956 median 92887 29% max 94690 Points min 77533 avg 82910 median 83517 26% max 85868 Points min 148074 avg 148912 median 149162 46% max 149249 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 80534 avg 86884 median 88577 54% max 91540 Points min 68241 avg 71814 median 44% max 73371 Points min 97864 avg 99848 median 99722 61% max 102082 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 236552 avg 243663 median 243861 43% max 250577 Points min 201881 avg 208685 median 208251 37% max 217442 Points min 327454 avg 329572 median 328778 58% max 333277 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total ScorePassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 121702 avg 154312 median 154312 20% max 186922 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 2385 avg 2407 median 2407 13% max 2429 Points min 3393 avg 3679 median 3705 20% max 3874 Points min 5013 avg 5063 median 5075 27% max 5101 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 5088 avg 5342 median 11% max 5595 Points min 3927 avg 4679 median 4655 10% max 5195 Points min 8407 avg 8786 median 8830 19% max 9121 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 5184 avg 5411 median 5305 35% max 5851 Points min 5603 avg 6743 median 44% max 7510 Points min 7595 avg 7769 median 7758 51% max 7966 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 5736 avg 6022 median 5891 29% max 6571 Points min 6854 avg 7925 median 40% max 9927 Points min 9557 avg 9777 median 49% max 10008 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Battery Lifemin 476 avg 551 median 11% max 585 min Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9810 → 100% n=29Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 → 102% n=29Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9820 → 138% n=29 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculationlog 12. 2221330 checking url part for id 9632 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 8554 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 11322 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9632 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 9632 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8554 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 8554 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11322 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 11322 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 15 return log +0s ... VS We compared two 8-core processors Samsung Exynos 9820 with Mali-G76 MP12 graphics and Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Adreno 540. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5SpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Samsung Exynos 9820 Announced 2-years laterShows significantly better up to 62% AnTuTu 9 score – 513K vs 316KHas a smaller size transistor 8 versus 10 nm11% higher CPU clock speed 2730 vs 2450 MHzSupports 12% higher memory bandwidth against GB/sBetter instruction set architecture Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Higher GPU frequency ~5% Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 133777 82968 GPU 178210 105394 Memory 88990 49513 UX 109918 75726 Total score 513831 316666 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 82% 95% Graphics test 19 FPS 6 FPS Score 3228 1165 Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9820 and Snapdragon 835 CPU Architecture 2x GHz – Mongoose M42x GHz – Cortex-A754x GHz – Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A734x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2730 MHz 2450 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache - 128 KB L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB Process 8 nanometers 10 nanometers Transistor count billion 3 billion TDP - 9 W Graphics GPU name Mali-G76 MP12 Adreno 540 Architecture Bifrost 3 Adreno 500 GPU frequency 702 MHz 739 MHz Execution units 12 2 Shading units 192 384 FLOPS 607 Gigaflops 567 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 12 GB 8 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Yes Hexagon 682 Storage type UFS UFS UFS Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160 Max camera resolution 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS 4K at 30FPS Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS 4K at 30FPS Video codecs VP9 VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem Exynos 5100 X16 4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 16 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 2000 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 316 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 835 18 Total votes 41 Related Comparisons Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 835 and Exynos 9820, or ask any questions VS We compared two 8-core processors Samsung Exynos 9810 with Mali-G72 MP18 graphics and Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Adreno 640. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Performs better in floating-point computationsHas a smaller size transistor 7 versus 10 nmShows better up to 27% AnTuTu 9 score – 522K vs 410KAnnounced 11-months laterSupports 19% higher memory bandwidth against GB/s Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 116977 141555 GPU 121725 184296 Memory 74973 62560 UX 93023 131223 Total score 410178 522806 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s 21 images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s 48 images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 93% 91% Graphics test 13 FPS 18 FPS Score 2272 3096 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile - 58 FPS [Ultra] Call of Duty Mobile - 56 FPS [Ultra] Fortnite - 28 FPS [Ultra] Shadowgun Legends - 51 FPS [Ultra] World of Tanks Blitz - 59 FPS [Ultra] Mobile Legends Bang Bang - 57 FPS [Ultra] Device - Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 1080 x 2340 We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9810 and Snapdragon 855 CPU Architecture 4x GHz – Exynos M34x GHz – Cortex-A55 1x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold3x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold4x GHz – Cortex-A55 Kryo 485 Silver Cores 8 8 Frequency 2900 MHz 2840 MHz Instruction set L1 cache - 512 KB L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB L3 cache - 2 MB Process 10 nanometers 7 nanometers Transistor count billion billion TDP 5 W 6 W Graphics GPU name Mali-G72 MP18 Adreno 640 Architecture Bifrost 2 Adreno 600 GPU frequency 572 MHz 585 MHz Execution units 18 2 Shading units 288 384 FLOPS 370 Gigaflops 899 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1800 MHz 2133 MHz Bus 2x 32 Bit 4x 16 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 6 GB 16 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Yes Hexagon 690 Storage type UFS UFS Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160 Max camera resolution 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS Video playback 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS Video codecs VP9 VP8, VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem Shannon 360 X24 LTE, X50 5G 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 20 5G support No Yes Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 5000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 200 Mbps Up to 1240 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 6 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 855 316 Total votes 438 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 855 and Exynos 9810, or ask any questions Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 vs Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Samsung Exynos 9810Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Mobile Platform MSM8998 is a high-end SoC for smartphones mostly Android based that was released early 2017. Its one of the first processors that is manufactured in 10 nm LPE FinFET at Samsung. The SD835 is the successor to the Snapdragon 821. It integrates 4x Kryo 280 at GHz max for performance and 4x Kryo 280 at GHz max for efficiency. Furthermore offers an X16 LTE modem, WiFi, a dual-channel 32-Bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller, an UFS controller, Hexagon 682 DSP, Spectra 180 Image Seonsor Prozessor, Bluetooth GPS, GLONASS, Baeidou, Galileo Satellite Exynos 9825 ► remove from comparisonThe Samsung Exynos 9 9825 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced in the Samsung Note 10 line in August 2019. The processor integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to GHz up from GHz in the 9820. Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ. The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro 8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload. The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores. Thanks to higher clock rates, the G76 is now a bit faster compared to the Exynos 9820. The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. Due to the slight changes in clock rates, it is very comparable to the older Eynos 9 9820. Maybe in longer load phases, the improved 7nm process helps to maintain clock speeds a bit better. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks. The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 7nm LPP with EUV process that should improve power efficiency compared to the Exynos Exynos 9810 ► remove from comparisonThe Samsung Exynos 9 9810 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2018 and should be integrated in the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 series at least partly. It integrates eight CPU cores octa core in two clusters. The performance cluster integrates four Samsung M3 at GHz and the power efficiency cluster four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at GHz. The Samsung M3 cores are based on Samsungs own design and now offer a wider pipeline, improved cache memory and bigger caches. This leads to a twice as fast single-core performance and a 40 percent improved multi-core performance according to Samsung most likely compared to the previous Exynos 8898. The integrated LTE modem also got a siginifcant upgrade and now supports LTE for up to Gbps download and 200 Mbps upload. This is achieved with 6x20 MHz CA, 256-QAM in download and 2x20 MHz in upload. As a GPU, Samsung integrates a ARM Mali G72MP18 only 18 clusters, compared to the 20 clusters of the predecessor G71MP20. Most likely Samsung increases performance due to a higher core clock of the graphics card. The memory controller looks similar to the 8898 and supports LPDDR4x 1800 MHz. The video engine now also supports 10 bit videos as before 4k120 and VP9 de- and encoding. The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 10nm LPP process the Exynos 8898 still used the 10nm LPE process that should also help with some of the performance Snapdragon 835 8998Samsung Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos 9810SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonSamsung ExynosSamsung ExynosCodenameKryo 280Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Clock2450 MHz1900 - 2730 MHz 3000 MillionTechnology10 nm7 nm10 nmFeaturesX16 LTE Modem, Adreno 540 GPU, Hexagon DSP, Spectra 180 Camera, Aqstic Audio, IZat Location, Haven SecurityARM Mali-G76MP12 GPU , 2x Samsung Mongoose Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A75, 4x Cortex-A55 LPDDR4x Memory ControllerARM Mali-G72MP18 GPU , 4x Exynos M3 max GHz, 4x Cortex-A55 max GHz LPDDR4x Memory ControlleriGPUQualcomm Adreno 540 - 710 MHzARM Mali-G76 MP12ARM Mali-G72 MP18ArchitectureARMARMARMAnnounced ManufacturerQualcomm Snapdragon SD 835Samsung Exynos Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos Exynos 9810Series Exynos Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos 9825 - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos 9810 - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos 9810 - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55BenchmarksCinebench - Cinebench CPU Multi 64 BitCinebench - Cinebench CPU Single 64 BitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single 32bitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi 32bit3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physicsmin 1493 avg 1501 median 4% max 1508 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 6729 avg 19196 median 20406 17% max 23046 Points min 31908 avg 32588 median 32588 27% max 33268 Points min 18756 avg 23944 median 26226 22% max 26851 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 1520 avg 2849 median 2969 37% max 3161 Points min 3389 avg 3519 median 3519 44% max 3649 Points min 2546 avg 2717 median 33% max 3120 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 1631 avg 2766 median 2960 42% max 3189 Points min 3498 avg 3622 median 3622 52% max 3746 Points min 2561 avg 2752 median 38% max 3148 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 805 avg 814 median 4% max 822 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2177 avg 2184 median 2184 7% max 2191 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1809 avg 1917 median 1920 20% max 1973 Points min 4549 avg 4550 median 4550 47% max 4551 Points min 3688 avg 3721 median 3698 38% max 3776 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 6006 avg 6515 median 6517 7% max 6799 Points min 10367 avg 10426 median 12% max 10484 Points min 8786 avg 8874 median 8874 10% max 8963 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 814 avg 1733 median 2021 29% max 2075 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2952 avg 5482 median 15% max 6552 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Coremin 3960 avg 4100 median 4100 7% max 4240 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Coremin 1144 avg 1155 median 1155 23% max 1166 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5674 avg 6126 median 6126 10% max 6578 Points min 5895 avg 5915 median 5915 9% max 5935 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1933 avg 1954 median 1954 29% max 1975 Points min 1961 avg 1965 median 1965 29% max 1969 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 1810 avg 2308 median 2308 19% max 2806 Points min 895 avg 1039 median 1039 8% max 1183 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 2528 avg 3500 median 32% max 4471 Points min 1898 avg 2002 median 18% max 2105 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11609 avg 12054 median 24% max 12498 Points min 10213 avg 10328 median 10328 20% max 10443 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5777 avg 5936 median 12% max 6094 Points min 5651 avg 5656 median 5656 11% max 5661 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 7193 avg 7226 median 7226 19% max 7259 Points min 6025 avg 6099 median 16% max 6172 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score min 2425 avg 3219 median 3175 4% max 4813 ms min 2478 avg 2503 median 2503 3% max 2528 ms min 2060 avg 2509 median 2394 3% max 3189 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score min 210 avg median 3% max 387 ms Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 3086 avg 11209 median 11484 11% max 14300 Points min 18908 avg 19022 median 18% max 19135 Points min 12933 avg 14397 median 14% max 15233 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 97 avg median 25% max 118 Points min 63 avg median 68 16% max 72 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 150208 avg 173235 median 175032 60% max 185487 Points min 291772 avg 292608 median 292608 100% max 293444 Points min 214090 avg 218110 median 217950 74% max 222290 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 8164 avg 9635 median 27% max 16148 Points min 18280 avg 18321 median 56% max 18361 Points min 7800 avg 8235 median 8294 25% max 8612 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 42180 avg 44325 median 53% max 47943 Points min 70640 avg 70670 median 87% max 70699 Points min 53528 avg 55588 median 55698 68% max 57538 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 77533 avg 82910 median 83517 26% max 85868 Points min 155432 avg 155907 median 155906 48% max 156381 Points min 91292 avg 92956 median 92887 29% max 94690 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 68241 avg 71814 median 44% max 73371 Points min 101869 avg 102259 median 102259 63% max 102649 Points min 80534 avg 86884 median 88577 54% max 91540 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 201881 avg 208685 median 208251 37% max 217442 Points min 347082 avg 347156 median 347156 61% max 347229 Points min 236552 avg 243663 median 243861 43% max 250577 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total ScorePassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 121702 avg 154312 median 154312 20% max 186922 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Battery Lifemin 476 avg 551 median 11% max 585 min PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 3393 avg 3679 median 3705 20% max 3874 Points min 2385 avg 2407 median 2407 13% max 2429 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 3927 avg 4679 median 4655 10% max 5195 Points min 5088 avg 5342 median 11% max 5595 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 5603 avg 6743 median 44% max 7510 Points min 8801 avg 8914 median 8914 58% max 9027 Points min 5184 avg 5411 median 5305 35% max 5851 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 6854 avg 7925 median 40% max 9927 Points min 11011 avg 11412 median 11412 57% max 11813 Points min 5736 avg 6022 median 5891 29% max 6571 Points Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 → 100% n=30Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9825 → 163% n=30Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9810 → 107% n=30 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 12. 2221290 checking url part for id 8554 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 11485 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 9632 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8554 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 8554 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11485 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 11485 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9632 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 9632 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 15 return log +0s ... Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 Update 2017-09-11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835Samsung Exynos 9810Why is Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 better than Samsung Exynos 9810?138MHz faster GPU clock speed?710MHzvs572MHzWhy is Samsung Exynos 9810 better than Qualcomm Snapdragon 835? faster CPU speed?4 x & 4 x x & 4 x faster downloads?1200MBits/svs1024MBits/sUses HMP? faster uploads?200MBits/svs150MBits/s2 more memory channels? higher single-core Geekbench 5 result? higher multi-core Geekbench 5 result?2028vs1461256KB bigger L1 cache?384KBvs128KBUser reviewsOverall ratingQualcomm Snapdragon 8354 User reviewsQualcomm Snapdragon 835Samsung Exynos 98103 User reviewsSamsung Exynos 9810FeaturesGeneral infoA 32-bit operating system can only support up to 4GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4GB, giving increased performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit integrated graphics you don’t need to buy a separate graphics semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices, offer more computational power. A small form factor allows more transistors to fit on a chip, therefore increasing its graphics processing unit GPU has a higher clock is used in games, with newer versions supporting better fifth-generation wireless technology delivers higher speeds and lower latency than the previous, fourth-generation turbo Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Samsung Exynos 9810When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased ES is used for games on mobile devices such as smartphones. Newer versions support better version Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Samsung Exynos 9810Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit GPU for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores processing units. It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of threads result in faster performance and better technology, a chip can switch between two sets of processor cores to maximize performance and battery life. For example, when playing a game the more powerful cores will be used to increase performance, whereas checking email will use the less powerful cores to maximize battery Multi-Processing HMP is a more advanced version of technology. In this setup, a processor can utilize all cores at the same time, or just a single core for low-intensity tasks. This can provide powerful performance or increased battery life clock speed Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Samsung Exynos 9810When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide multiplier Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Samsung Exynos 9810The clock multiplier controls the speed of the cache Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide can support faster memory, which will give quicker system Double Data Rate memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more maximum amount of memory RAM is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the version Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Samsung Exynos 9810A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a system on a chip SoC has an integrated LTE cellular chip. LTE is capable of downloading at faster speeds than older, 3G download speed is a measurement of the internet connection bandwidth, representing the maximum data transfer rate at which a device can access online upload speed is a measurement of the internet connection bandwidth, representing the maximum data transfer rate at which a device can send information to a server or another technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management DRM.Multithreading technology such as Intel's Hyperthreading or AMD's Simultaneous Multithreading provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor's physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at bit helps protect the computer from malicious provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to is used to speed up encryption and Floating-Point VFP is used by the processor to deliver increased performance in areas such as digital 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor's single-core performance. Source Primate Labs, 2023Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor's multi-core performance. Source Primate Labs, 2023PassMark result Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Samsung Exynos 9810This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple result single Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Samsung Exynos 9810This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single result overclocked Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Samsung Exynos 9810This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU when it is Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 9200 PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 7c Plus Gen 3Show allThis page is currently only available in English.

snapdragon 835 vs exynos 9810